Before and After

Not all of my work survives the test of time.  The image here is a revision of a piece I made in November. A few months ago, I was working on making "more interesting" backgrounds, but the original background just looked chaotic and confusing. Of course the piece didn't sell, so I brought it home and re-made the background. I think this one works better because there is both interest and harmony. The music adds texture without being overwhelming.

The purple bird piece also received a make-over. The original background was very dark. While the  contrast made the bird stand out, the overall feel was disconcertingly dark. I think this revision allows for the bird to remain the focal point, but the background is now more engaging.

Since I really enjoy the process of making art, revisions aren't usually distressing to me. I almost always like the second version better, and I get positive feedback from others regarding the changes. I liken this to the writing process I teach my students. The first, second and sometimes even the third draft still needs improvement. I know that artists through the ages over painted their work that didn't stand the test of time; why should I be any different?